<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cineblog.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cineblog.us/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cineblog.us</link>
	<description>...because it&#039;s not about the popcorn.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:31:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tentpole Genre Releases 2011 by Victor Sparrow</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2011/01/tentpole-genre-releases-2011/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineblog.us/?p=574#comment-543</guid>
		<description>&#039;They Live&#039; is a favorite of mine, however, do you really think that 2011 SFX are enough to justify a remake? Has the social climate changed enough to give Carpenter&#039;s Extraterrestrial Zombies a new shading?

Yes and no. There&#039;s the whole Terrorism thing and the Zombie craze, but I don&#039;t necessarily think of the two as sympathetic.

Xenophobia? I&#039;ll have to re-watch it. 

The idea of protesting zombie Tea Partiers is, however, delicious. 

Zombie Tea Partiers, their parasols and ornamental yip-dogs are something I would pay to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;They Live&#8217; is a favorite of mine, however, do you really think that 2011 SFX are enough to justify a remake? Has the social climate changed enough to give Carpenter&#8217;s Extraterrestrial Zombies a new shading?</p>
<p>Yes and no. There&#8217;s the whole Terrorism thing and the Zombie craze, but I don&#8217;t necessarily think of the two as sympathetic.</p>
<p>Xenophobia? I&#8217;ll have to re-watch it. </p>
<p>The idea of protesting zombie Tea Partiers is, however, delicious. </p>
<p>Zombie Tea Partiers, their parasols and ornamental yip-dogs are something I would pay to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tentpole Genre Releases 2011 by Anne Dougherty</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2011/01/tentpole-genre-releases-2011/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Dougherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineblog.us/?p=574#comment-542</guid>
		<description>You know what I think is ripe for an update: They Live - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/

It totally taps into current culture&#039;s fear of the foreign.  Plus, imagine how much better the effects would be circa 2011 vs. 1988.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I think is ripe for an update: They Live &#8211; <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/</a></p>
<p>It totally taps into current culture&#8217;s fear of the foreign.  Plus, imagine how much better the effects would be circa 2011 vs. 1988.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Tron: Legacy&#8217; (2010) in IMAX 3D by Victor Sparrow</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2010/12/tron-legacy-2010-in-imax-3d/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Sparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineblog.us/?p=571#comment-541</guid>
		<description>There were many, many practical sets and FX, which I found strange given that it&#039;s now possible to do much of what they should have done here with Green Screens and CGI. 

Disney has created a sequel to its 1982 film about cyberspace, when the most popular understanding of computers existed at the video arcade and there were no such things as a personal computers.

One would have thought that the producers of Tron: Legacy, if not Disney suits like majority shareholder, Steve Jobs, would see a late sequel to the pre-internet Tron as an opportunity to sell computers and steal Matrix-fire from Joel Silver, the Wachowski Bros. and Warner Bros&#039;: Disney had the opportunity to do a MAJOR franchise reboot here, something which could have done &#039;Pirates of the Carribbean&#039;, numbers and become a new franchise, but they punted.

I didn&#039;t see it in 3D, but seen anamorphically, &#039;Tron:Legacy&#039; looks and feels like a Tron sequel, &lt;em&gt;if it had been made back in 1983&lt;/em&gt;. The visuals and storytelling in &#039;Tron:Legacy&#039; iare about as kludgy as George Lucas&#039; first feature, THX 1138 (1971).

For the $170M that Disney spent on this movie, it should have been plenty more interesting.

(&#039;Tron:Legacy&#039; opened on Dec 17th 2010, and almost a month later, it still hasn&#039;t broken even.)

Enough of noble efforts and computer games -- this one&#039;s a fail.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10011582-TRON_legacy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
49% Fail @ Rottentomatoes.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were many, many practical sets and FX, which I found strange given that it&#8217;s now possible to do much of what they should have done here with Green Screens and CGI. </p>
<p>Disney has created a sequel to its 1982 film about cyberspace, when the most popular understanding of computers existed at the video arcade and there were no such things as a personal computers.</p>
<p>One would have thought that the producers of Tron: Legacy, if not Disney suits like majority shareholder, Steve Jobs, would see a late sequel to the pre-internet Tron as an opportunity to sell computers and steal Matrix-fire from Joel Silver, the Wachowski Bros. and Warner Bros&#8217;: Disney had the opportunity to do a MAJOR franchise reboot here, something which could have done &#8216;Pirates of the Carribbean&#8217;, numbers and become a new franchise, but they punted.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see it in 3D, but seen anamorphically, &#8216;Tron:Legacy&#8217; looks and feels like a Tron sequel, <em>if it had been made back in 1983</em>. The visuals and storytelling in &#8216;Tron:Legacy&#8217; iare about as kludgy as George Lucas&#8217; first feature, THX 1138 (1971).</p>
<p>For the $170M that Disney spent on this movie, it should have been plenty more interesting.</p>
<p>(&#8216;Tron:Legacy&#8217; opened on Dec 17th 2010, and almost a month later, it still hasn&#8217;t broken even.)</p>
<p>Enough of noble efforts and computer games &#8212; this one&#8217;s a fail.<br />
<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10011582-TRON_legacy/" rel="nofollow"><br />
49% Fail @ Rottentomatoes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;District 9&#8242; (2009) by Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2009/08/district-9-2009/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=366#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Metafilter commentary here:
http://www.metafilter.com/84384/Cat-food</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metafilter commentary here:<br />
<a href="http://www.metafilter.com/84384/Cat-food" rel="nofollow">http://www.metafilter.com/84384/Cat-food</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;X-Men Origins: Wolverine&#8217; (2009) by -B.</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2009/05/x-men-origins-wolverine-2009/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>-B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=342#comment-247</guid>
		<description>As a kid X-men was one of the comics that I started with, and to be sure like many of the people who were reading X-men in 1976 Wolverine was one of my favorites with his berserker rages and shadowy past that hinted at psychopathic killing sprees in the line of whatever duty he was doing (ah! the past when his history was mostly inferences to things too violent to reveal). The only disappointment with Hugh Jackman is that he&#039;s somewhere around 6&#039; plus whereas Wolverine is supposed to be 5&#039;3&quot;. Other than that, Hugh Jackman IS Wolverine. That was my opinion from the first movie and he has subsequently inhabited the character beautifully ever since. Only in the movie though can he be considered a first generation X-Man, in the comics he was a part of the second group gathered together to rescue the first group from Krakoa the Living Island (or something goofy like that. Yet another example of why it&#039;s so great to have these movies strip out some of the more dubious story lines from the comic book canon). Actually, I understand in the comics recently they retro-fitted yet another group of X-Men to get trapped on Krakoa before the traditional first group was trapped. 

 What the progression of military units both Logan and Victor are a part of between their father&#039;s death and their parting in Vietnam is that apparently they are very good at being those soldiers on the front lines without revealing the secret of their mutant heritage, and that they are really quite old. To have delved on anything more during this would have been a mistake of trying to show too much in the wrong part of the movie. I&#039;m sure Marvel would love to step up to the task of populating 8 more Wolverine titles to more fully expand and retro-fit his history with dubious profit making filler but I for one am grateful that Gavin Hood chose not to add unwritten chapters to the life of Marvel&#039;s favorite mutant.
 
 The struggle between Logan&#039;s animal side and his humanity is missing. It isn&#039;t enough that Victor eventually embraces his most predatory instincts, and is the stand-in for what Wolverine could become. Maybe they&#039;re waiting for the inevitable second and third installments. Somewhere in the grand overview of the whole Wolverine prequel project, he needs to slip into a dangerous and debilitating anger-management problem. Berserker rage. 

 To say the problem with one prequel (Wolverine) is that, like another prequel (SWE3), it is a prequel and we know where it is going seems like an easy way to make complaining noises. No one likes to bitch more than me, and certainly I know the only way you ever get good at bitching is with constant practice, but once you&#039;ve amassed the proper experience with bitching, you recognize complaining for complaining&#039;s sake, and that is a rookie mistake.

  If you come to the Wolverine movie hoping to find some levity then you likely smiled when you saw the preview of the Blob and Logan in the boxing ring where Blob belly-flops Wolverine through the ring-ropes, complete with some ridiculous sound effect of the Blob&#039;s reverberating belly. That sound effect, thankfully is somewhere on the cutting room floor. The humor here should be much more sophisticated like the sink scene, or when Logan called the Blob &#039;Bub&#039; and the Blob thought he heard &#039;Blob&#039;. Very slick that the Blob gets his name from not understanding a classic bit of Wolverine dialog, and that the Blob is the only person to refer to himself by that derogatory name. Too inside a trick for anyone but comic book fans to understand. Still, Hood reached too far when at the end of the boxing/sparring match his club-fisted handling of Logan bullying the Blob had Logan popping his claws through the big red boxing glove. You know Gavin was trying to be cute, which would have been appropriate if the movie were a Hello Kitty movie or something, but really I would&#039;ve hoped he handle the character that is the Crown Jewel of all comic book characters with a little more consideration and quite frankly seriousness that Wolverine deserved. Oh well.

 The character of Storm would be a good choice for a next Origins movie, but even though I have not whined as loudly as some in the manifest wrongness in the casting of Halle Berry as Ororo, she should not be allowed to pretend that that her performance was deserving of a whole movie being dedicated to it. I recall, it was either her appearance on Letterman or the Tonight show before the first X-Men movie opened where she whined this is what talented Black actresses are reduced to in Hollywood, having to play in... comic book movies. No. With any luck there will never be a Halle Berry &#039;X-Men Origins: Storm&#039; movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a kid X-men was one of the comics that I started with, and to be sure like many of the people who were reading X-men in 1976 Wolverine was one of my favorites with his berserker rages and shadowy past that hinted at psychopathic killing sprees in the line of whatever duty he was doing (ah! the past when his history was mostly inferences to things too violent to reveal). The only disappointment with Hugh Jackman is that he&#8217;s somewhere around 6&#8242; plus whereas Wolverine is supposed to be 5&#8217;3&#8243;. Other than that, Hugh Jackman IS Wolverine. That was my opinion from the first movie and he has subsequently inhabited the character beautifully ever since. Only in the movie though can he be considered a first generation X-Man, in the comics he was a part of the second group gathered together to rescue the first group from Krakoa the Living Island (or something goofy like that. Yet another example of why it&#8217;s so great to have these movies strip out some of the more dubious story lines from the comic book canon). Actually, I understand in the comics recently they retro-fitted yet another group of X-Men to get trapped on Krakoa before the traditional first group was trapped. </p>
<p> What the progression of military units both Logan and Victor are a part of between their father&#8217;s death and their parting in Vietnam is that apparently they are very good at being those soldiers on the front lines without revealing the secret of their mutant heritage, and that they are really quite old. To have delved on anything more during this would have been a mistake of trying to show too much in the wrong part of the movie. I&#8217;m sure Marvel would love to step up to the task of populating 8 more Wolverine titles to more fully expand and retro-fit his history with dubious profit making filler but I for one am grateful that Gavin Hood chose not to add unwritten chapters to the life of Marvel&#8217;s favorite mutant.</p>
<p> The struggle between Logan&#8217;s animal side and his humanity is missing. It isn&#8217;t enough that Victor eventually embraces his most predatory instincts, and is the stand-in for what Wolverine could become. Maybe they&#8217;re waiting for the inevitable second and third installments. Somewhere in the grand overview of the whole Wolverine prequel project, he needs to slip into a dangerous and debilitating anger-management problem. Berserker rage. </p>
<p> To say the problem with one prequel (Wolverine) is that, like another prequel (SWE3), it is a prequel and we know where it is going seems like an easy way to make complaining noises. No one likes to bitch more than me, and certainly I know the only way you ever get good at bitching is with constant practice, but once you&#8217;ve amassed the proper experience with bitching, you recognize complaining for complaining&#8217;s sake, and that is a rookie mistake.</p>
<p>  If you come to the Wolverine movie hoping to find some levity then you likely smiled when you saw the preview of the Blob and Logan in the boxing ring where Blob belly-flops Wolverine through the ring-ropes, complete with some ridiculous sound effect of the Blob&#8217;s reverberating belly. That sound effect, thankfully is somewhere on the cutting room floor. The humor here should be much more sophisticated like the sink scene, or when Logan called the Blob &#8216;Bub&#8217; and the Blob thought he heard &#8216;Blob&#8217;. Very slick that the Blob gets his name from not understanding a classic bit of Wolverine dialog, and that the Blob is the only person to refer to himself by that derogatory name. Too inside a trick for anyone but comic book fans to understand. Still, Hood reached too far when at the end of the boxing/sparring match his club-fisted handling of Logan bullying the Blob had Logan popping his claws through the big red boxing glove. You know Gavin was trying to be cute, which would have been appropriate if the movie were a Hello Kitty movie or something, but really I would&#8217;ve hoped he handle the character that is the Crown Jewel of all comic book characters with a little more consideration and quite frankly seriousness that Wolverine deserved. Oh well.</p>
<p> The character of Storm would be a good choice for a next Origins movie, but even though I have not whined as loudly as some in the manifest wrongness in the casting of Halle Berry as Ororo, she should not be allowed to pretend that that her performance was deserving of a whole movie being dedicated to it. I recall, it was either her appearance on Letterman or the Tonight show before the first X-Men movie opened where she whined this is what talented Black actresses are reduced to in Hollywood, having to play in&#8230; comic book movies. No. With any luck there will never be a Halle Berry &#8216;X-Men Origins: Storm&#8217; movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Fringe&#8221; (2008) by Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2008/12/fringe-2008/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=285#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I gave Fringe my standard 3 hours I give to a new drama before I make a judgment (well, in this case 4 since the first ep. was 2 hours).  Maybe it just got started too slowly but I wasn&#039;t grabbed.  The antagonistic relationship between Dunham and her boss was too ramped up; the science geek father professor just a little too whoo-whoo out there; the global conspiracy theory too much to swallow in an era of corporations that can&#039;t even manage to make a profit and what seems like a 26hr news cycle churning constantly to give us the latest and greatest.

That said, recent episodes have looked more intriguing so perhaps I&#039;ll take another look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave Fringe my standard 3 hours I give to a new drama before I make a judgment (well, in this case 4 since the first ep. was 2 hours).  Maybe it just got started too slowly but I wasn&#8217;t grabbed.  The antagonistic relationship between Dunham and her boss was too ramped up; the science geek father professor just a little too whoo-whoo out there; the global conspiracy theory too much to swallow in an era of corporations that can&#8217;t even manage to make a profit and what seems like a 26hr news cycle churning constantly to give us the latest and greatest.</p>
<p>That said, recent episodes have looked more intriguing so perhaps I&#8217;ll take another look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Fringe&#8221; (2008) by -B.</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2008/12/fringe-2008/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>-B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=285#comment-168</guid>
		<description>It looks like you can catch all the full episodes online for free if you miss the TV broadcast at http://www.fox.com/fringe/   
The thing is at least on the episode I watched there was the same truck commercial every 10 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you can catch all the full episodes online for free if you miss the TV broadcast at <a href="http://www.fox.com/fringe/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fox.com/fringe/</a><br />
The thing is at least on the episode I watched there was the same truck commercial every 10 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; (2008) by Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2008/09/the-dark-knight-2008/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=206#comment-147</guid>
		<description>yes the movie grossed millions?  Why...it is horrific violence...tand the fact that it would not sell unless it contained so much is sad and frightening.  This is why we have so much in the streets and events like 9/11...we as a collective attract this into our lives...as you think, so you become!  &quot;we&quot; are becoming more and more immune   The economy is crashing down around us...the millions of dollars spent on this kind of entertainment could be put to better use.  Like paying some of the higher taxes you will get hit with as a result of the bailout...you don&#039;t think that the morons who dragged the country into this will have to pay do you?  They retreat to the Upstate Mansions, while the rest of you pay for it out of your hard earned salaries.  WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Children and young adults should be reading to enrich the mind not being dulled into a stupor from the entertainment industry.  Sure, some entertainment is good...a break from the routine, but this was just awful.  Will we ever learn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes the movie grossed millions?  Why&#8230;it is horrific violence&#8230;tand the fact that it would not sell unless it contained so much is sad and frightening.  This is why we have so much in the streets and events like 9/11&#8230;we as a collective attract this into our lives&#8230;as you think, so you become!  &#8220;we&#8221; are becoming more and more immune   The economy is crashing down around us&#8230;the millions of dollars spent on this kind of entertainment could be put to better use.  Like paying some of the higher taxes you will get hit with as a result of the bailout&#8230;you don&#8217;t think that the morons who dragged the country into this will have to pay do you?  They retreat to the Upstate Mansions, while the rest of you pay for it out of your hard earned salaries.  WAKE UP PEOPLE!</p>
<p>Children and young adults should be reading to enrich the mind not being dulled into a stupor from the entertainment industry.  Sure, some entertainment is good&#8230;a break from the routine, but this was just awful.  Will we ever learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; (2007) by adk</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2008/08/mad-men-2007/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>adk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=168#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been watchin&quot; it with wide eyed wonder.  Love the hyper-real &quot;snapshot &quot;of that moment in history... played with no apologies for the wrongness of it all....

And though the substance is scary in its believable bigotry, and blatant mass media manipulations, I can&#039;t deny that I am really diggin&#039; the style. I LOVE the clothes, furnishings etc...  So sue me....*

a.

p.s. For Musical self-mockery on the very same topic, time and place, watch &quot;How to Suceed in Business Without Really Trying&quot;.
and
Also from the very same period, different Musical. Can you I.D. &quot;Sue Me&quot;? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been watchin&#8221; it with wide eyed wonder.  Love the hyper-real &#8220;snapshot &#8220;of that moment in history&#8230; played with no apologies for the wrongness of it all&#8230;.</p>
<p>And though the substance is scary in its believable bigotry, and blatant mass media manipulations, I can&#8217;t deny that I am really diggin&#8217; the style. I LOVE the clothes, furnishings etc&#8230;  So sue me&#8230;.*</p>
<p>a.</p>
<p>p.s. For Musical self-mockery on the very same topic, time and place, watch &#8220;How to Suceed in Business Without Really Trying&#8221;.<br />
and<br />
Also from the very same period, different Musical. Can you I.D. &#8220;Sue Me&#8221;? <img src='http://www.cineblog.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Iron Man&#8217; (2008) by Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.cineblog.us/2008/05/iron-man-2008/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cineblog.us/?p=132#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Wow...since you seem to care so much more you can have it.  You&#039;re 100% right and I have no idea what I&#039;m talking about.  

The fact that you conflate knowledge of the comics with the movie is meaningless.  The fact that you&#039;re anticipating sequels rather than judging this film on its own merits as a stand-alone work is irrelevant.

You win.  My review is shit.  Thanks for your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;since you seem to care so much more you can have it.  You&#8217;re 100% right and I have no idea what I&#8217;m talking about.  </p>
<p>The fact that you conflate knowledge of the comics with the movie is meaningless.  The fact that you&#8217;re anticipating sequels rather than judging this film on its own merits as a stand-alone work is irrelevant.</p>
<p>You win.  My review is shit.  Thanks for your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

